Abstract: |
This study examined the frequency of goal-line critical decisions and compared it to other sources of critical goal calls, for investigating the necessity of Goal Line Technology for top level soccer. 1167 games of the 1st and 2nd German Bundesliga were screened for such critical decisions, including penalty calls as well. 16.8 critical goal-line decisions were found per season, of which 76.6 % could directly be resolved by tv-review. On average, 5.0 and 2.8 cases were found respectively in the 1st and 2nd Bundesliga that could justify goal-line technology. Furthermore, just 5.0 % of all critical calls concerned goal-line decisions, while 84.3 % involve offside, representing the main reason for critical goal calls (Handing: 3.3 %; Foul: 7.3 %). Furthermore, 20.6 % of the investigated penalty calls (i.e. one per match day) were rated “doubtful”. The findings of the study show, that in terms of a cost-benefit-relation a TV-review would be more useful than Goal Line Technology. |